Monday, May 29, 2006

5-29-06 Memorial Day

This is the one official day in America set aside specifically to honor those who have given their lives in war.

A history of Memorial Day can be found here...

http://www.usmemorialday.org/backgrnd.html

Whether you are a hawk or a dove, there is no question that those who went to war and gave their lives deserve a place of honor in this society. Motives, agendas, political leanings, and any other "reasons why" any person may have entered service in the military and ended up dying in that service are transcended by the "ultimate sacrifice". There is no question as to the higher moral ground upon which these war dead have been elevated.

We can mourn their loss no matter what our beliefs are.

On this day we pay homage to the men and women who have been cut down in the prime of their lives as casualties of war. For them, all debts are forgiven, no transgressions in life could possibly tarnish the sacrifice they made, and no living person has any recourse but to honor them.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

5-28-06 A Four Day Weekend

I took Friday off to make a four day weekend for myself. Four days of work, four days off, then another four day work week. It's really just an exercise in where the American Dream was supposed to have progressed to by now.

Remember back to the 1950's and 1960's when the "future" was looking so bright? It was a 40 hour, five day work week back then. Most Dads worked while most Moms stayed at home and raised the kids. It could be done that way, back then. And our future, everyone agreed, would become easier and easier as technology progressed and did more and more of the work, while we would be able to enjoy more and more free time. In fact, one of the most popular TV shows of the time, "The Jetsons", showed us what life in the 21st century might be like. Commuting cars that collapsed down into briefcases, jobs that involved pushing a button a few times each day, and a fabulous life filled with technological wonders!...

Well, here we are! Welcome to the future!

The 1960 dollar is now only worth sixteen cents. It cost the US mint more money to make a penny or a nickel than the coins are worth. The median household income in America for 2004 was $44, 389. That translates to $7005 in 1960 dollars, which, interstingly enough, is about what the median household income was that year.

In other words, nothing seems to have actually changed.

Even gasoline, which is now around three bucks a gallon, has never really taken a bigger bite out of median income all these years, except for a couple of spikes. Adjusted for inflation, gas prices are about the same.

The one thing that has really changed is the cost of a house. The house I grew up in was worth about the same as an average year's pay, back when my parents bought it. It tended to remain in that range of about an average year's pay until the real estate boom of the 1980's. That's when the price of a house doubled. And it's doubled again in the past decade. Now you need FOUR years' worth of an average household income to buy a house. You also need four times as much to rent an apartment.

Sneaky, huh? That's where the whole thing broke down.

The REAL value of the money is only one quarter of what the official "inflation" statistics claim, because if you look at the value of REAL property, you get the REAL value involved. Consequently, this "median household income" stated in the statistics for last year, this $44, 389, is REALLY only worth $11, 097. And if you want to live anywhere other than in a tent or under a bridge, you REALLY need to make four times that amount every year! If you do make that much, then you can keep up the appearance of the American Dream, like it was four and a half decades ago.

So, as long as I can afford to take an extra day off and make a couple of weeks into four day work weeks with four days off in the middle, I'm certainly gonna do it! I'm just glad I bought my house when I did, fifteen years ago when the cost of a house was less than half what it would sell for today. Otherwise, I'd be working 12 hours a day, seven days a week just to have a place to sleep!

Friday, May 26, 2006

5-26-06 What About Afghanistan - part 3

I have to say that I don't get terribly excited about conspiracy theories. It isn't that I don't enjoy this sort of "mind candy" on a regular basis, it's just that I'm not a "player" in the world. I'm just an ordinary citizen, doing whatever's necessary to enjoy an ordinary life. So when it comes to this sort of thing, understand that I'm posting these things from a basic perspective of promoting a sense of open-mindedness about what may or may not be going on in the world.

From that perspective, the idea that the world-wide illegal drug trade is an integral and significant portion of the world's commerce has to be taken for granted. I mean, billions and billions of dollars flowing around every year is very significant, don't you think?

In addition, I would find it very difficult to believe that any activity involving billions and billions of dollars in cash every year would ever be an activity that world government entities would EVER sneeze at and say, "Oh my goodness! That kind of activity is morally wrong!"

Here's links to two people that have personal stories to tell the world about the world-wide illegal drug trade...

http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?s=d29afa84ad712b4c6c41a9ae37536306&showtopic=9854

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/about_Mike_part_one.shtml

Anyone who believes that the CIA, British Intelligence, or the Mosad would be standing on such moral high ground as to not dig into that kind of cash because "drugs are bad" has to be living in a fantasy world. The propositions that Michael C. Rupert and James Casbolt expound at such great length upon are not popular subjects, of course, because their testimony is involved with such a difficult to swallow pill.

Personally, I don't think it's such a bad thing. It's just basically an insane thing. Why profit on human misery?

Anyway, the idea here is that I believe people should be open minded about the various possibilities for cabal and hidden agendas and so forth. It's just a basic exercise in not remaining ignorant of what may or may not be going on in the world.

One perspective of this whole thing about the world-wide illegal drug trade is that the cash from this kind of activity is sometimes claimed to be one of the important aspects of the stock market. It's a great place to launder money. If the billions and billions in cash, or even a significant portion of that cash, runs through Wall Street, then making drugs legal would, of course, crash the stock market immediately.

So that would be one of the arguments against making any of the currently illegal drugs legal. "Whaddya wanna do, ass-hole, crash the whole stock market???"

Meanwhile, the opium crop in Afghanistan is moving ahead quite nicely, thank you...

And back in Washington, DC, the current trend regarding the CIA seems to be that the Bush administration wants to focus on cutting off its head, so to speak, and re-organizing the whole operation so that it's less autonomous and is controlled more directly by the executive branch. After all, if there's billions of dollars of untrace-able cash flowing through there... well, you get the idea.

I mean, what's more important and valuable to crooks, liars, and cheats? The "intelligence" the CIA gathers, or the billions of dollars of invisible cash made from the drug trade?

Basically, this perspective really makes a whole heck of lot more sense to me than the idea that the US government is waging a "War on Drugs" while the availability of illegal drugs in the country has never been abated in the least during all these years. I mean, if that paltry little bunch of nutbag religious zealots in Afghanistan could completely ERASE the illegal drug trade in their own country all those years, what sort of outcome would it be in America if the US government was REALLY out to erase it here? And remember, the Taliban didn't erase the illegal drug trade INTO Afghanistan all those years, they erased the world's NUMBER ONE PRODUCER of opium from the world market!

So, let's not split hairs about this. The testimony is freely available on the internet, the outcomes of various conflicts and events over the years clearly lines up with the whole idea, and the world-wide illegal drug trade continues to thrive without a dent. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to observe the obvious.

5-26-06 NIMBY

For the past five years, under the aegis of fighting the Global War On Terror, the President, Congress, and even the Courts have been steamrollering through the laws of this country, international laws, and traditional protections that Americans have taken for granted since the ratification of the Constitution. Our government has attacked a sovriegn nation under false pretenses and lies, our government has captured people without any due process, held them in prisons for years without any judicial process and tortured them, our government has accessed the private communications of US citizens without any warrants, ... the list of lying, stealing, corrupt and criminal activities by our government representatives is too long to enumerate here. All of this has proceeded along with the blessings of all three branches of our national government.

Suddenly, we are shown that this wholesale slaughter of the very fabric of our freedom is "not okay" when one branch of the government does it to another branch. It's okay to run roughshod over the rights of everyone else in the world, but when it's a member of the US House of Representatives, apparently, that's where they "draw the line"!

It's really pathetic how this administration, congress, and crony-stacked court system has become the machine of destruction, but when it's turned on one of THEM, the whole attitude is suddenly one of outrage.

THEY are outraged????

We are witnessing the self-destruction of our government, folks... what took generations of blood, sweat, and tears to build is being destroyed in less than a decade. And the only slightest hint of outrage coming out of Washington is this pathetic cry of, "Hey! Not In My Back Yard!!!"

Thursday, May 25, 2006

5-25-06 Further Out

Yesterday I wrote about the discovery of two more planets in our Solar System, out beyond Pluto. Today, it's about a twelfth planet, cooked up by the Sumerians 6000 years ago, according to this guy...

http://www.sitchin.com/

...Zecharia Sitchin has been writing about his version of the local star system for about three decades. He began his quest as a boy, studying the Torah in Hebrew, and questioning the meaning of the word "Nefilim", among other things. His first book (in a series), "The 12th Planet", is clearly full of speculative holes and wide open for criticism (which is easily found on the web). But I like this guy. He's a true romantic in his personal quest to "prove" the "true meanings" of things in the Old Testament.

Mostly, he focuses on the ancient writings of Sumeria, found on clay tablets and seals, lending his own spin on what these things "really mean" in a larger context. That larger context is the etymological nuances of historical scholarship, which he tends to brush aside without a care in the world. It's comical at times, since his tendencies are so blatant.

But what we have here is something that many of us tend to believe. It's that sense of playing "telephone", where the literal context and meaning of a message gets altered as it passes from person to person. In Sitchin's paradigm of the world, the Old Testament is the result of thousands of years of playing "telephone"... and he goes into this quest for the "real meanings" of words and phrases in the Old Testament with such a level of conviction that it's difficult to stop reading, provoked into wondering just how far out on a limb he's willing to go.

Well, he certainly goes out on a limb, there's no doubt about that!

"The 12th Planet" is Sitchin's entry into the main theme that Earth has been visited by Aliens. It's such a far out idea, that no-one can take it seriously on the face of it. So I decided to read it from the perspective of it being more like a science fiction story. I haven't quite finished it, but so far it's held my attention for a number of reasons.

One reason is that, in my view, there are only two explanations for the huge array of myths and legends from the ancient past dealing with a God or many Gods. One is that the human mind (and there are many variations on this theme) is capable of, and has a need, to imagine something greater than itself. The other explanation would be that, somewhere back in the ancient past, Earth really was visited by "Gods" or what were perceived as Gods at the time.

Evidence of the former is the demonstrated success of themes from traditional religions to Sci-Fi to UFO's and "Ancient Astronauts". These subjects garner a large audience in churches, mosques, temples, bookstores, in movies, and on television. Evidence of the latter, in any strictest sense of the word, is lacking. Yet, the evidential criteria seems to be the make/break point of any arguments for or against the whole thing.

This is where hard science and beliefs knock heads all the time.

Sitchin comes out of a Jewish religious tradition and upbringing. But it's clear that his imagination is more than fertile. So it's up the reader to decide whether his imaginings are based in credible evidence, which he spends the bulk of his text on, or just plain baloney.

If you can wade through the obvious influences of his upbringing and his tendency to position himself as knowing better than the rest of the world of scholarship over the past centuries, it's still an enjoyable read if you tend to believe, as I do, that the Old Testament has probably suffered from a very long line of alterations, mis-duplications, and mis-interpretations over the past few thousand years.

It isn't really a matter of whether he's "right" or not. It's that he really believes he's "onto something" with all of this, and has made this his life's work. Eight books since 1978 comprise this collection of work.

Basically, where the "Da Vinci Code" tantalizes the reader with the concept of the New Testament having a long history of alterations, mis-duplications, and mis-interpretations, this series of books does the same thing with the Old Testament. If you enjoyed reading the Da Vinci Code, you'll get an even bigger "gee-whiz" from reading Sitchin's work.

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

5-24-06 Far Out

Last month, this press release came out...

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-04/bri-emf042406.php

...regarding the discovery of a planet out beyond Pluto, which has been named "Sedna". Sedna is smaller than Pluto, and exhibits anomalous orbital behavior. "It shouldn't be there," commented one of the interviewees on this subject. In addition, there's yet another planet out beyond Pluto that was discovered earlier, this one larger than Pluto and named "Xena", which also exhibits anomalous orbital behavior.

In the linked story, a fellow named Walter Cruttenden is brought into the picture, since he wrote a book detailing the theory that our sun may have a "companion star", making our solar system a "binary system". He wrote a book about this, "Lost Star of Myth and Time", with a website here...

http://www.loststarbook.com/

Interesting stuff, to be sure. I wonder sometimes just how far out future discoveries will take us.

Monday, May 15, 2006

5-15-06 Soylent Yellow

Today, I ran across this article...

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025513.200-maize-in-global-gene-bank-crisis.html

...which, outrageously, will never see the light of day in the mainstream media because of all the crap going down in Washington lately. It's about the failure of at least half the world-wide seed stocks of corn to germinate this year because of mis-handling prior to being put into storage.

Two days ago, on the same site....

http://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg19025513.700-a-future-with-no-bananas.html

...another disaster is described as looming for bananas.

The biodiversity of food crops is just taken for granted. We think, well, the ordinary banana MUST be so rife across this planet that there could never be a problem that would cause a shortage that anyone should ever be concerned about for very long. These things just GROW NATURALLY, for goodness' sake!

Well, not any more.

The international agri-businesses that have turned the small farmer into an extinct species tends to centralize things, and this centralization has brought us to this point where entire strains of vegetables and fruits, hybridized over the years for the most sought after qualities, can easily be completely wiped out if the centralized areas of storage or production have a problem. In the case of the corn, decades of hybridization and work have now been completely lost with the current seed stocks failing to germinate. Whole strains of different varieties no longer exist on this planet because of this one mistake in handling prior to storage!

It's a ghastly development.

Friday, May 12, 2006

5-12-06 What About Afghanistan - part 2

Back in January, I talked about the opium crop in Afghanistan and how it was a glowing demonstration of the concept of "free markets" and, therefore, an embarassment to the PR machinery in our government. After all, we are not only fighting the so-called "Global War On Terror," but we have to remember that we're also fighting the so-called "War On Drugs," too.

Under the Taliban, the single biggest provider of the world's heroin sank to insignificance. Afghanistan, under Taliban rule, did not significantly contribute to the so-called "drug problem". But after the country was liberated by the US, the following year Afghanistan magically returned to the world stage as the number one producer of opium, and has been back in business ever since. This year it's another record crop.

This year, however, there's a new spin developing...

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article363606.ece

...claiming that the Taliban will be making lots of money off this crop.

Until this story, I would have easily been tempted to metaphorically state something like, "...that's about as unlikely as the Taliban using opium profits to finance their insurgency in Afghanistan." But now it would have to be something more like, "...that's about as unlikely as strip clubs in Iran," since the orwellian spin (from the Independant artiicle) on the opium crop has been hijacked.

It isn't so much that I don't believe the Taliban in southern Afghanistan would extort payoffs from the opium farmers. After all, they're no longer in control of that country and it's believable that they'd do whatever's necessary to their ends, which is just disruptive activity at this point. It's the spin on this alleged development that's got me going here.

It's the players in this orwellian PR game that make me want to puke.

Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden... these are PR icons straight out of Emmanuel Goldstein's "The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism." Only the names have been changed to protect the guilty.

5-12-06 Tax Cuts

From my perspective as a person with a relatively low income, the idea of "tax cuts for the wealthy" initially hits me as a negative. The whole story is hardly contained in that major media spin, however. After the "tax cuts for the wealthy", the top 50% (highest incomes) in America still accounted for over 96% of the 2003 revenues the government received on individual income tax returns.

It breaks down like this... The top 1% (highest incomes) paid over one third of the revenues. The top 5% paid over half the revenues. The top 10% paid over 65% of the revenues. The top 25% paid over 83% of the revenues, and the top 50% paid over 96% of revenues.

The "other half", the lowest income 50% accounted for 3.46% of the revenues.

It means that somewhere in the neighborhood of two million people in this country accounted for over 34% of the revenues in 2003. Twenty million people accounted for just under another third of the revenues. Another 95 to 100 million people accounted for about another 30% of the revenues, and the remaining 120 million who paid income tax accounted for just under 3-1/2% of revenues.

This is the way that progressive or graduated taxation is supposed to work. Both Adam Smith and Karl Marx spoke in favor of this kind of "tax the rich" philosophy. It's difficult to find much in the way of support, throughout our country's history, for the antithesis. So, having Bush give the highest income people in America a tax break isn't really giving the lower income people in America a kick in the face. It's basically just bad timing.

It's bad timing because of all the other bullshit going on. If it had been done during the Clinton years, it would have made more sense. That it's ten years behind the trends of the nation's financial needs is just bad timing.
But it certainly makes sense when you understand that everything else Bush has done over the past six years is, basically, insane.

As a spoiled rich kid, his resume speaks for itself regarding the fate of Arbusto, the oil company that junior ran into the ground before becoming governor of Texas. His resume is littered with business dealings that essentially did absolutely nothing for anyone but himself and his cronies, while putting the screws to any other investors outside this circle of buddies. While governor of Texas, the list of sweetheart deals and investor scams that got Bush cronies loads of money from state coffers is enough to turn anyone's stomach.

Nothing changed when Dubya became President, except that the scale of the corruption went national and international, with the coffers of the whole nation now being subjected to this kind of theft. The consistency of the record is quite easily perceived.

So, the "tax cuts for the wealthy" don't really bother me so much as all the other bullshit. These tax cuts are merely a side effect of the medicine that Dubya administers. The defect in this man's basic character is that he is personally ignorant of what it's like to suffer. All his life, he has clearly been unaffected by anyone else's suffering or travails in life. Such a man is an easy target for those surrounding him to use to their advantage.

In the fantasy world of "good guy versus bad guy", this man has no slightest clue that he is the bad guy. And because he is basically THAT insane, it won't take a broken business or a broken state, or even a broken nation to bring the truth of his deeds being evil to dawn upon that lowbrow brain of his. The only thing that will bring the truth home to a person like this is a jury pronouncing him guilty. Only on that personal level would an idiot such as this finally come to ask, "I'm the bad guy????"

Thursday, May 04, 2006

5-4-06 Demographics

I ran across an interesting observation today at TCS daily...

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=050406H

...all about a climate change report being released on the net for people to comment on, prior to its release next year.

It was an interesting piece, but what prompted me to write this piece on demography was a sentence down near the end of the linked article, to wit, "One of the big things we've found out about demography in recent decades is that as societies become richer, population growth slows, stabilizes, and then goes into reverse."

This is what's happened in America.

The demonstration of the above statement is America during the past 50 years. As our middle class rose to prominance, population growth rates slowly fell, and are now stabilizing. At this rate, the population growth in America will go into reverse.

But there's more to this, because what we're going through at this point is a change in the numbers of people who are working, producing members of society, versus the numbers of people who are either too young or too old to work. In years past, this was somewhere on the order of six or seven people working, versus one person too old or too young to work. Six or seven to one is economically viable.

In other words, you can support those unable to contribute to the economy when you have that six to one ratio. In recent years this has slipped down to 5 to 1, and is now heading down to around 4 to 1.

What we have happening in this country is a lowered birth rate, and a generation of baby boomers starting to go into retirement. The median age in this country is going up fast. It has been projected that the ratio will probably slip down to 3 to 1 within the next five or ten years, and 2 to 1 within the next twenty years.

Those ratios are economically unviable.

It is, unfortunately, where we're headed as a nation.

It's very difficult to get this subject across to people these days, because the prospects for the future economic viability of our culture and society depend upon one thing, and one thing only: new blood. But you can't come at the subject from that angle these days. You have to start with the numbers, and the projected demographics, just to broach the whole subject of immigration.

We're a nation of people that come from other nations. What we have today in American society is the mixture of other cultures, fused into what we experience in our lives now. Our heritage is mixed, every one of us. Somewhere back along the ancestral lineage, every one of us ultimately has their family tree tracing back to someone who came here from somewhere else. (Yes, I know, the native americans... but you can even trace them back from somewhere else. The anthropoligists are still trying to figure out from where and when they came from. But we have to admit, they were here first.)

The simple fact is, however, that this society cannot survive economically without a huge influx of immigrants over the next twenty years. You can worry about global warming, and asteroids hitting the earth from outer space all you want. These things have some credibility, and we can agree that someday there's definitely going to be an asteroid hit, and someday there's probably going to be effects of climate change that will be undeniable. The big question is when. But as far as our future economic viability is concerned, we're talking about a very definite "when". It's only twenty years away. It's a statistical fact.

We can have discourse on how to do something about global warming, and we can have discussions about what we might be able to do about an asteroid that may be headed our way, but these are all things that are somewhat hazy, somewhat ill-defined, and off in some indistinct future that nobody seems to be able to specifically nail down.

This one, however, is just a plain, simple fact. No huge influx of immigrants over the next twenty years means that this country will be tanked economically. Only two short decades to go.

I could suggest that, as an alternative, we could all get real busy making babies... But you know and I know that this is not a solution that anybody could ever realistically plan on actually working. What's the congress going to do? Pass laws mandating baby quotas?

No, it's much more realistic to get America's head out of its ass on the subject of immigration. We have a ready made solution to the problem, just chomping at the bit to get in. In fact, there are so many of them eager to come here, that millions of them are by-passing all the immigration laws to get here!

Well, at any rate, I just thought it might be helpful to anyone talking about immigration these days to learn about this one simple fact, and what bearing it might have on the current immigration hoopla.

All those people who demonstrated across the country on May first... well, there just weren't enough. We need a whole heck of a lot more than that. We need them real fast, too.